Regulatory Affairs Consulting

Senior regulatory leadership that moves drug development forward.

Suite Life Sciences Consulting partners with biotech and specialty pharma to build regulatory strategy, run FDA submissions, and stand up the systems and teams that carry a program from IND to approval — on a fractional, interim, or project basis.

25+
Years in regulatory affairs
VP
Level leadership, biotech & pharma
RAC
Certified since 2006
What I do

Regulatory support sized to your program.

Whether you need a hands-on leader for a critical submission or a steady regulatory voice in the room, engagements flex to the stage and scale of your company.

Regulatory Strategy & Leadership

Fractional or interim head of regulatory for small-to-mid-size companies — building the strategy, the roadmap, and the team to execute it.

FDA Submissions & Interactions

INDs, NDAs, 505(b)(2) applications, orphan drug and pediatric filings, and sNDAs — plus the meeting strategy behind Type A–D interactions and End-of-Phase 2.

Advertising & Promotion Review

Promotional review governance, launch-readiness, and the escalation processes that keep commercial claims compliant without stalling the business.

Global Regulatory

EMA, MHRA, BfArM, TGA and Health Canada strategy — and coordinating ex-US filings through regional partners and marketing collaborators.

Regulatory Due Diligence

Independent regulatory assessment for financing, licensing, and corporate development — surfacing the risks and inflection points that drive valuation.

Systems & Operating Model

Selecting and standing up label management, EDMS, and RIM/publishing capabilities — building regulatory infrastructure ahead of growth, not behind it.

About

A regulatory leader who has done the work.

Suite Life Sciences Consulting is the practice of Mark Charest, MS, RAC — a regulatory affairs executive with more than 25 years across biotech and specialty pharma, from rare disease and GI to pain and specialty products.

As a VP of Regulatory Affairs and, in earlier roles, the US and Global Regulatory Lead serving as the primary FDA point of contact, Mark has run 20+ FDA meetings, built submission and label-management systems, secured pediatric exclusivity worth roughly $100M, and led regulatory strategy through financings and corporate development.

The through-line is a roll-up-your-sleeves operator who builds regulatory capability sized to the company in front of him — pragmatic, honest about risk, and focused on keeping programs moving.

Engagements available through Suite Life Sciences Consulting, LLC on a 1099 or Corp-to-Corp basis.

Credentials & Reach

  • MS, Health Product Regulation — Regis College
  • RAC — Regulatory Affairs Certification (2006–present)
  • AI in Regulatory Science — Northeastern University (2026)
  • INDs, NDAs, 505(b)(2), orphan drug & pediatric filings
  • FDA, EMA, MHRA, BfArM, TGA & Health Canada experience
Expertise

Depth where it counts.

Two-and-a-half decades of regulatory work concentrated where small and mid-size companies feel the most pressure.

Therapeutic areas

Rare disease, GI, pain & specialty, drug-device combination products, and CNS-adjacent programs.

Submissions

IND, NDA, 505(b)(2), sNDA, orphan drug & pediatric exclusivity, CTAs, and eCTD strategy.

Agency interactions

Pre-IND through Type A–D meetings, End-of-Phase 2, Advisory Committees, and Emerging Technology programs.

Function-building

Standing up regulatory teams, promotional review governance, and label / document management systems.

When to call

You may need fractional regulatory leadership if…

Most engagements start at one of these moments. If one of them describes where you are, the conversation is probably worth having.

Your regulatory leader just left.

A vacancy at the top of regulatory stalls submissions, agency correspondence, and decisions that cannot wait for a search to conclude.

A critical FDA meeting is coming.

Pre-IND, End-of-Phase 2, Type B or C. The briefing package and the questions you ask determine what the Agency lets you do next.

You are building toward an IND or a major submission.

The work is cross-functional, the timeline is fixed, and it needs someone who has run one end to end before.

The program has outgrown the regulatory infrastructure.

Processes, SOPs, submission planning, and document and label management that were adequate at Phase 1 are not adequate at Phase 3.

You need senior judgment, not a full-time executive.

A steady regulatory voice in development and leadership discussions, sized to what the company actually needs right now.

An investment or licensing decision is in front of you.

Independent regulatory diligence that surfaces the risks and inflection points before the term sheet, not after.

Approach

How an engagement works.

Straightforward, low-friction, and built around your program's timeline — not a long onboarding.

Scope

A short working session to understand the program, the regulatory questions in front of you, and where an outside leader adds the most value.

Engage

A defined engagement — fractional leadership, an interim seat, or a specific submission or due-diligence project — with clear deliverables and cadence.

Deliver

Hands-on execution and a clear paper trail, so the strategy, submissions, and systems outlast the engagement.

Have a regulatory challenge worth a conversation?

Whether it's a submission on a deadline, a function that needs building, or a program that needs a seasoned regulatory voice — let's talk.